Athlon 64 FX-60 vs i7-980X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-980X
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.29
+853%
Athlon 64 FX-60
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 110 Watt
0.45

Core i7-980X outperforms Athlon 64 FX-60 by a whopping 853% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-980X and Athlon 64 FX-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13612936
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.23no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.120.39
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Toledo (2006)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$959no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-980X and Athlon 64 FX-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate6.4 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size239 mm2199 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-980X and Athlon 64 FX-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366939
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt110 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-980X and Athlon 64 FX-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-980X and Athlon 64 FX-60 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-980X and Athlon 64 FX-60 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-980X and Athlon 64 FX-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-980X and Athlon 64 FX-60.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-980X 4.29
+853%
Athlon 64 FX-60 0.45

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-980X 6817
+861%
Athlon 64 FX-60 709

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.29 0.45
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 110 Watt

i7-980X has a 853.3% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 FX-60, on the other hand, has 18.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-980X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-60 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-980X and Athlon 64 FX-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-980X
Core i7-980X
AMD Athlon 64 FX-60
Athlon 64 FX-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 90 votes

Rate Core i7-980X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-980X or Athlon 64 FX-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.