Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs i7-980X EE
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-980X EE outperforms Phenom II X6 1100T BE by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-980X EE and Phenom II X6 1100T BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1457 | 1496 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core i7 (Desktop) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.80 | 2.74 |
| Architecture codename | Gulftown (2010−2011) | Thuban (2010) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 7 December 2010 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-980X EE and Phenom II X6 1100T BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 6400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 346 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 904 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-980X EE and Phenom II X6 1100T BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA-1366 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 125 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-980X EE and Phenom II X6 1100T BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-980X EE and Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.84 | 3.62 |
| Threads | 12 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 125 Watt |
i7-980X EE has a 6.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE, on the other hand, has 4% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-980X EE and Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-980X EE and Phenom II X6 1100T BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
