Athlon X2 QL-65 vs i7-980

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-980 and Athlon X2 QL-65 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1343not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.20no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency3.18no data
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date26 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,109no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-980 and Athlon X2 QL-65 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rate4.8 GT/s3600 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-980 and Athlon X2 QL-65 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-980 and Athlon X2 QL-65. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.265 nm, 1.075 - 1.125
AES-NI+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core i7-980 and Athlon X2 QL-65 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-980 and Athlon X2 QL-65 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-980 and Athlon X2 QL-65. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-980 and Athlon X2 QL-65.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-980 6936
+1039%
Athlon X2 QL-65 609

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 June 2011 1 September 2009
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

i7-980 has an age advantage of 1 year, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon X2 QL-65, on the other hand, has 271.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-980 and Athlon X2 QL-65. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-980 is a desktop processor while Athlon X2 QL-65 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-980 and Athlon X2 QL-65, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-980
Core i7-980
AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-65

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 45 votes

Rate Core i7-980 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 127 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-980 or Athlon X2 QL-65, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.