EPYC 7313 vs i7-9700F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9700F
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.66
EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.54
+195%

EPYC 7313 outperforms Core i7-9700F by a whopping 195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9700F and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking895198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.2217.05
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency12.1515.03
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$323$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7313 has 85% better value for money than i7-9700F.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9700F and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3030
L1 cache512 KB1 MB
L2 cache2 MB8 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9700F and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA1151SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700F and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-

Security technologies

Core i7-9700F and EPYC 7313 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700F and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700F and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700F and EPYC 7313.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9700F 8.66
EPYC 7313 25.54
+195%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-9700F 13250
EPYC 7313 39091
+195%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-9700F 1575
+5.9%
EPYC 7313 1487

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-9700F 6304
EPYC 7313 11432
+81.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.66 25.54
Recency 23 April 2019 12 January 2021
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 155 Watt

i7-9700F has 138.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has a 194.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9700F in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-9700F is a desktop processor while EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700F and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9700F
Core i7-9700F
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 665 votes

Rate Core i7-9700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9700F or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.