Opteron 144 vs i7-965
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-965 outperforms Opteron 144 by a whopping 980% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-965 and Opteron 144 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1863 | 3234 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.45 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.57 | 0.22 |
| Architecture codename | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| Release date | November 2008 (16 years ago) | June 2003 (21 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,509 | $65 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-965 and Opteron 144 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.46 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 6.4 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-965 and Opteron 144 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366 | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-965 and Opteron 144. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-965 and Opteron 144 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-965 and Opteron 144 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-965 and Opteron 144. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.16 | 0.20 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 85 Watt |
i7-965 has a 980% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron 144, on the other hand, has 52.9% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-965 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 144 in performance tests.
Note that Core i7-965 is a desktop processor while Opteron 144 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-965 and Opteron 144, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
