i3-9100F vs i7-965

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-965
2008
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.16
Core i3-9100F
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.26
+97.2%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Core i7-965 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-965 and Core i3-9100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18481370
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.459.92
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency1.576.18
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release dateNovember 2008 (16 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,509$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-9100F has 305% better value for money than i7-965.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-965 and Core i3-9100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate6.4 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size263 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-965 and Core i3-9100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-965 and Core i3-9100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-965 and Core i3-9100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-965 and Core i3-9100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-965 and Core i3-9100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size24 GB64 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-965 and Core i3-9100F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-965 2.16
i3-9100F 4.26
+97.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-965 3424
i3-9100F 6735
+96.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-965 490
i3-9100F 1396
+185%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-965 1708
i3-9100F 3726
+118%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.16 4.26
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

i7-965 has 100% more threads.

i3-9100F, on the other hand, has a 97.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-9100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-965 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-965 and Core i3-9100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-965
Core i7-965
Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 24 votes

Rate Core i7-965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 7008 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-965 or Core i3-9100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.