Ryzen 5 1600AF vs i7-880

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-880 and Ryzen 5 1600AF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1873not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.08no data
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)11 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$583no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-880 and Ryzen 5 1600AF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.06 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size296 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-880 and Ryzen 5 1600AF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-880 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-880 and Ryzen 5 1600AF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-880 and Ryzen 5 1600AF are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-880 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-880 and Ryzen 5 1600AF.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2010 11 October 2019
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600AF has an age advantage of 9 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-880 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-880 and Ryzen 5 1600AF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-880
Core i7-880
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF
Ryzen 5 1600AF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 149 votes

Rate Core i7-880 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 269 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600AF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-880 or Ryzen 5 1600AF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.