i3-4100E vs i7-875K

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-875K
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.95
+68.1%
Core i3-4100E
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.16

Core i7-875K outperforms Core i3-4100E by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-875K and Core i3-4100E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19432362
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency1.942.97
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)4 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$486$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-875K and Core i3-4100E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.93 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size296 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors774 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-875K and Core i3-4100E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156Intel BGA1364
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-875K and Core i3-4100E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-875K and Core i3-4100E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-875K and Core i3-4100E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-875K and Core i3-4100E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 4600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-875K and Core i3-4100E.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-875K 1.95
+68.1%
i3-4100E 1.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-875K 3100
+67.7%
i3-4100E 1848

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.95 1.16
Recency 30 May 2010 4 September 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 37 Watt

i7-875K has a 68.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i3-4100E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 156.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-875K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4100E in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-875K is a desktop processor while Core i3-4100E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-875K and Core i3-4100E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-875K
Core i7-875K
Intel Core i3-4100E
Core i3-4100E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 63 votes

Rate Core i7-875K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 3 votes

Rate Core i3-4100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-875K or Core i3-4100E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.