i3-1115G4 vs i7-875K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-875K
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.95
Core i3-1115G4
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
3.80
+94.9%

Core i3-1115G4 outperforms Core i7-875K by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-875K and Core i3-1115G4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19551479
Place by popularitynot in top-10047
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency1.9312.78
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$486no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-875K and Core i3-1115G4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.93 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s4 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size296 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors774 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-875K and Core i3-1115G4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-875K and Core i3-1115G4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-875K and Core i3-1115G4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-875K and Core i3-1115G4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-875K and Core i3-1115G4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-875K and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-875K and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-875K and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-875K and Core i3-1115G4.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-875K 1.95
i3-1115G4 3.80
+94.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-875K 3100
i3-1115G4 6038
+94.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-875K 509
i3-1115G4 1566
+208%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-875K 1766
i3-1115G4 3056
+73%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.95 3.80
Recency 30 May 2010 2 September 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 28 Watt

i7-875K has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i3-1115G4, on the other hand, has a 94.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 239.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-1115G4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-875K in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-875K is a desktop processor while Core i3-1115G4 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-875K and Core i3-1115G4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-875K
Core i7-875K
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Core i3-1115G4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 63 votes

Rate Core i7-875K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 5400 votes

Rate Core i3-1115G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-875K or Core i3-1115G4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.