Celeron M 350 vs i7-875K

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-875K and Celeron M 350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1943not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency1.94no data
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$486no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-875K and Celeron M 350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed2.93 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s400 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size296 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors774 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-875K and Celeron M 350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156PPGA478, H-PBGA479, H-PBGA478, PPGA479
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-875K and Celeron M 350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bit32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-875K and Celeron M 350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-875K and Celeron M 350 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-875K and Celeron M 350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-875K and Celeron M 350.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 21 Watt

i7-875K has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 350, on the other hand, has 352.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-875K and Celeron M 350. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-875K is a desktop processor while Celeron M 350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-875K and Celeron M 350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-875K
Core i7-875K
Intel Celeron M 350
Celeron M 350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 63 votes

Rate Core i7-875K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Celeron M 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-875K or Celeron M 350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.