i3-3225 vs i7-870S

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-870S
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 82 Watt
1.77
+22.9%
Core i3-3225
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.44

Core i7-870S outperforms Core i3-3225 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-870S and Core i3-3225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20252202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.002.43
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date19 July 2010 (14 years ago)3 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$264

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-870S and Core i3-3225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size296 mm2118 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors774 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-870S and Core i3-3225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)82 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-870S and Core i3-3225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-870S and Core i3-3225 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data-
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-870S and Core i3-3225 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-870S and Core i3-3225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 4000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-870S and Core i3-3225 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-870S and Core i3-3225.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-870S 1.77
+22.9%
i3-3225 1.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-870S 2765
+23.5%
i3-3225 2239

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.77 1.44
Recency 19 July 2010 3 September 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 82 Watt 55 Watt

i7-870S has a 22.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i3-3225, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 49.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-870S is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3225 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-870S and Core i3-3225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-870S
Core i7-870S
Intel Core i3-3225
Core i3-3225

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Core i7-870S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 228 votes

Rate Core i3-3225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-870S or Core i3-3225, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.