Atom N470 vs i7-870

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-870 and Atom N470 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1928not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.97no data
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date8 September 2009 (15 years ago)1 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$305$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-870 and Atom N470 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.93 GHz1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size296 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors774 million123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-870 and Atom N470 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-870 and Atom N470. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-870 and Atom N470 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-870 and Atom N470 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-870 and Atom N470. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size16 GB2 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel GMA 3150

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-870 and Atom N470.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-870 3137
+1300%
Atom N470 224

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-870 4007
+568%
Atom N470 600

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-870 5881
+994%
Atom N470 538

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 September 2009 1 March 2010
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 6 Watt

i7-870 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Atom N470, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 1483.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-870 and Atom N470. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-870 is a desktop processor while Atom N470 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-870 and Atom N470, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-870
Core i7-870
Intel Atom N470
Atom N470

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1103 votes

Rate Core i7-870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 37 votes

Rate Atom N470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-870 or Atom N470, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.