EPYC 9535 vs i7-8670

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-8670 and EPYC 9535 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date1 January 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,992

Detailed specifications

Core i7-8670 and EPYC 9535 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads12128
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size149 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-8670 and EPYC 9535 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
Socket1151SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8670 and EPYC 9535. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
SIPP+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-8670 and EPYC 9535 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8670 and EPYC 9535 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8670 and EPYC 9535. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8670 and EPYC 9535.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2018 10 October 2024
Physical cores 6 64
Threads 12 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 300 Watt

i7-8670 has 361.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9535, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 966.7% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-8670 and EPYC 9535. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-8670 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9535 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8670 and EPYC 9535, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-8670
Core i7-8670
AMD EPYC 9535
EPYC 9535

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Core i7-8670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9535 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-8670 or EPYC 9535, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.