Xeon Gold 6246 vs i7-860

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-860
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.89
Xeon Gold 6246
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 165 Watt
15.63
+727%

Xeon Gold 6246 outperforms Core i7-860 by a whopping 727% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-860 and Xeon Gold 6246 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1969435
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.186.94
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency1.888.96
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date8 September 2009 (15 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229$3,286

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6246 has 3756% better value for money than i7-860.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-860 and Xeon Gold 6246 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads824
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate2.5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data33
L1 cache64 KB (per core)768 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)12 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)24.75 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size296 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C76 °C
Number of transistors774 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-860 and Xeon Gold 6246 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-860 and Xeon Gold 6246. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-860 and Xeon Gold 6246 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-860 and Xeon Gold 6246 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-860 and Xeon Gold 6246. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size16 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-860 and Xeon Gold 6246.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-860 1.89
Xeon Gold 6246 15.63
+727%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-860 2999
Xeon Gold 6246 24829
+728%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.89 15.63
Recency 8 September 2009 2 April 2019
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 8 24
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 165 Watt

i7-860 has 73.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6246, on the other hand, has a 727% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6246 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-860 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-860 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6246 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-860 and Xeon Gold 6246, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-860
Core i7-860
Intel Xeon Gold 6246
Xeon Gold 6246

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 753 votes

Rate Core i7-860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6246 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-860 or Xeon Gold 6246, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.