i7-13700F vs i7-840QM

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-840QM
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.23
Core i7-13700F
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
24.53
+1894%

Core i7-13700F outperforms Core i7-840QM by a whopping 1894% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-840QM and Core i7-13700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2310203
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.06
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency2.5935.71
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$568$359

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-840QM and Core i7-13700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads824
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier14no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size296 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors774 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-840QM and Core i7-13700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-840QM and Core i7-13700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology+2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-840QM and Core i7-13700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-840QM and Core i7-13700F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-840QM and Core i7-13700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s89.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-840QM and Core i7-13700F.

PCIe version25.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-840QM 1.23
i7-13700F 24.53
+1894%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-840QM 1952
i7-13700F 38958
+1896%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-840QM 383
i7-13700F 2685
+601%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-840QM 1039
i7-13700F 15903
+1431%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 24.53
Recency 20 June 2010 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 24
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

i7-840QM has 44.4% lower power consumption.

i7-13700F, on the other hand, has a 1894.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 300% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Core i7-13700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-840QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-840QM is a notebook processor while Core i7-13700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-840QM and Core i7-13700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-840QM
Core i7-840QM
Intel Core i7-13700F
Core i7-13700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 80 votes

Rate Core i7-840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 490 votes

Rate Core i7-13700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-840QM or Core i7-13700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.