EPYC 7543 vs i7-7800X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-7800X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 140 Watt
8.40
EPYC 7543
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
39.79
+374%

EPYC 7543 outperforms Core i7-7800X by a whopping 374% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-7800X and EPYC 7543 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking92275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.377.89
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency5.4716.13
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date30 May 2017 (7 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$383$3,761

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7543 has 134% better value for money than i7-7800X.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-7800X and EPYC 7543 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3528
L1 cache384 KB2 MB
L2 cache6 MB16 MB
L3 cache8.25 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-7800X and EPYC 7543 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2066SP3
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-7800X and EPYC 7543. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core i7-7800X and EPYC 7543 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-7800X and EPYC 7543 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-7800X and EPYC 7543. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-7800X and EPYC 7543.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes28128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-7800X 8.40
EPYC 7543 39.79
+374%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-7800X 12856
EPYC 7543 60901
+374%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.40 39.79
Recency 30 May 2017 12 January 2021
Physical cores 6 32
Threads 12 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 225 Watt

i7-7800X has 60.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7543, on the other hand, has a 373.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7543 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-7800X in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-7800X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7543 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-7800X and EPYC 7543, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-7800X
Core i7-7800X
AMD EPYC 7543
EPYC 7543

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 181 vote

Rate Core i7-7800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7543 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-7800X or EPYC 7543, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.