i3-330UM vs i7-7700T

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1246not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.10no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i3
Power efficiency12.92no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$303no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier299
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP+-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 630Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz500 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-7700T 7586
+1267%
i3-330UM 555

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-7700T 1259
+566%
i3-330UM 189

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-7700T 3932
+832%
i3-330UM 422

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-7700T 6824
+426%
i3-330UM 1297

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-7700T 21587
+624%
i3-330UM 2982

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-7700T 8273
+536%
i3-330UM 1301

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-7700T 6.92
+517%
i3-330UM 42.73

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-7700T 8
+673%
i3-330UM 1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2017 24 May 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

i7-7700T has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

i3-330UM, on the other hand, has 94.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-7700T is a desktop processor while Core i3-330UM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-7700T and Core i3-330UM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-7700T
Core i7-7700T
Intel Core i3-330UM
Core i3-330UM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 73 votes

Rate Core i7-7700T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 7 votes

Rate Core i3-330UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-7700T or Core i3-330UM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.