Atom C3958 vs i7-740QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-740QM
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.15
Atom C3958
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 31 Watt
2.47
+115%

Atom C3958 outperforms Core i7-740QM by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-740QM and Atom C3958 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23681748
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.53
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Atom
Power efficiency2.427.54
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date20 June 2010 (14 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$546$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-740QM and Atom C3958 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed1.73 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1320
L1 cache64 KB (per core)896 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size296 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C83 °C
Number of transistors774 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-740QM and Atom C3958 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-740QM and Atom C3958. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-740QM and Atom C3958 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-740QM and Atom C3958 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-740QM and Atom C3958. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory size8 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-740QM and Atom C3958.

PCIe version23
PCI Express lanes1616
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-740QM 1.15
Atom C3958 2.47
+115%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-740QM 1833
Atom C3958 3929
+114%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 2.47
Recency 20 June 2010 15 August 2017
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 31 Watt

Atom C3958 has a 114.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 45.2% lower power consumption.

The Atom C3958 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-740QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-740QM is a notebook processor while Atom C3958 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-740QM and Atom C3958, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-740QM
Core i7-740QM
Intel Atom C3958
Atom C3958

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 157 votes

Rate Core i7-740QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-740QM or Atom C3958, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.