Pentium 4 630 vs i7-720QM

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-720QM and Pentium 4 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2429not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7Pentium 4
Power efficiency2.19no data
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Prescott 2M
Release date23 September 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$546no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-720QM and Pentium 4 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads82
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate2.5 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size296 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C67 °C
Number of transistors774 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-720QM and Pentium 4 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt84 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-720QM and Pentium 4 630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-720QM and Pentium 4 630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-720QM and Pentium 4 630 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-720QM and Pentium 4 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-720QM and Pentium 4 630.

PCIe version2no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-720QM 1657
+509%
Pentium 4 630 272

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-720QM 2995
+86.6%
Pentium 4 630 1605

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-720QM 8357
+323%
Pentium 4 630 1975

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-720QM 16.64
+519%
Pentium 4 630 103

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 84 Watt

i7-720QM has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 86.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-720QM and Pentium 4 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i7-720QM is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-720QM and Pentium 4 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-720QM
Core i7-720QM
Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 155 votes

Rate Core i7-720QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 125 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-720QM or Pentium 4 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.