Pentium 3550M vs i7-720QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-720QM
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.04
+23.8%
Pentium 3550M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 37 Watt
0.84

Core i7-720QM outperforms Pentium 3550M by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-720QM and Pentium 3550M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24262571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Pentium
Power efficiency2.192.15
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date23 September 2009 (15 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$546$134

Detailed specifications

Core i7-720QM and Pentium 3550M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate2.5 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size296 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors774 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-720QM and Pentium 3550M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988FCPGA946
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-720QM and Pentium 3550M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-720QM and Pentium 3550M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-720QM and Pentium 3550M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-720QM and Pentium 3550M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-720QM and Pentium 3550M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
VGAno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-720QM and Pentium 3550M.

PCIe version22.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-720QM 1.04
+23.8%
Pentium 3550M 0.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-720QM 1657
+24.6%
Pentium 3550M 1330

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 0.84
Recency 23 September 2009 1 September 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 37 Watt

i7-720QM has a 23.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Pentium 3550M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 21.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-720QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3550M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-720QM and Pentium 3550M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-720QM
Core i7-720QM
Intel Pentium 3550M
Pentium 3550M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 155 votes

Rate Core i7-720QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 40 votes

Rate Pentium 3550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-720QM or Pentium 3550M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.