i5-10510U vs i7-720QM
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-720QM and Core i5-10510U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2424 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i7 | Comet Lake |
Power efficiency | 2.19 | no data |
Architecture codename | Clarksfield (2009−2010) | Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) |
Release date | 24 June 2009 (15 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $546 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-720QM and Core i5-10510U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 2.5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 12 | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 296 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 774 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-720QM and Core i5-10510U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | FCPGA988,PGA988 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-720QM and Core i5-10510U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-720QM and Core i5-10510U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-720QM and Core i5-10510U are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-720QM and Core i5-10510U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | None | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-720QM and Core i5-10510U.
PCIe version | 2 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
i5-10510U has a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-720QM and Core i5-10510U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-720QM and Core i5-10510U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.