i5-430UM vs i7-6950X

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6950X and Core i5-430UM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking708not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.82no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Core i5
Power efficiency7.38no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-E (2016)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)20 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6950X and Core i5-430UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads204
Base clock speed3 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate9.6 GT/s / QPI1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data9
L1 cache32K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache25 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,800 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6950X and Core i5-430UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6950X and Core i5-430UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0+
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Response+no data
PAEno data36 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-6950X and Core i5-430UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6950X and Core i5-430UM are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6950X and Core i5-430UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-6950X and Core i5-430UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6950X and Core i5-430UM.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6950X 17351
+2667%
i5-430UM 627

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2016 20 June 2010
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 20 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 18 Watt

i7-6950X has an age advantage of 5 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

i5-430UM, on the other hand, has 677.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-6950X and Core i5-430UM. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-6950X is a desktop processor while Core i5-430UM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6950X and Core i5-430UM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6950X
Core i7-6950X
Intel Core i5-430UM
Core i5-430UM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 253 votes

Rate Core i7-6950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate Core i5-430UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6950X or Core i5-430UM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.