Ryzen 3 4300G vs i7-6900K

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6900K
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
9.14
+34%
Ryzen 3 4300G
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
6.82

Core i7-6900K outperforms Ryzen 3 4300G by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 3 4300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8341021
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.96no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency6.159.89
Architecture codenameBroadwell-E (2016)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,020no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 3 4300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data38
L1 cache32 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 3 4300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 3 4300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 3 4300G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 3 4300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 3 4300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 3 4300G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6900K 9.14
+34%
Ryzen 3 4300G 6.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6900K 14470
+34.1%
Ryzen 3 4300G 10791

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.14 6.82
Recency 31 May 2016 21 July 2020
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

i7-6900K has a 34% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 3 4300G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-6900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 4300G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 3 4300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6900K
Core i7-6900K
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
Ryzen 3 4300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 108 votes

Rate Core i7-6900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 166 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6900K or Ryzen 3 4300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.