Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs i7-6820HQ
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2608L v4 outperforms Core i7-6820HQ by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1360 | 1270 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.35 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Power efficiency | 9.03 | 8.88 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 (9 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $378 | $363 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | QPI |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 2 × 6.4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 27 | 16 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 122 mm2 | 246.24 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA1440 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| My WiFi | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| SIPP | + | - |
| Smart Response | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | - |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 1,536 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 530 | no data |
| Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over VGA | N/A | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 40 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.31 | 4.71 |
| Recency | 1 September 2015 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
i7-6820HQ has 11.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2608L v4, on the other hand, has a 9.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4.
Be aware that Core i7-6820HQ is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2608L v4 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6820HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
