Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 vs i7-6820EQ

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6820EQ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1332not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.57no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i72x AMD Turion Ultra
Power efficiency9.27no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Puma (2008−2009)
Release date12 October 2015 (9 years ago)4 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6820EQ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s3600 MHz
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache8 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size122 mm2no data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6820EQ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataS1g2
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core i7-6820EQ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR2
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-6820EQ 1156
+458%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 207

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-6820EQ 3797
+811%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 417

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2015 4 June 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

i7-6820EQ has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-6820EQ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6820EQ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6820EQ
Core i7-6820EQ
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Core i7-6820EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 36 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6820EQ or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.