Xeon MP 3.66 vs i7-6700TE
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-6700TE and Xeon MP 3.66 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1448 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.54 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
Power efficiency | 10.45 | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Cranford (2005) |
Release date | 19 October 2015 (9 years ago) | March 2005 (19 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $303 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-6700TE and Xeon MP 3.66 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.67 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 24 | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 16 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 122 mm2 | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-6700TE and Xeon MP 3.66 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | 1151 | 604 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6700TE and Xeon MP 3.66. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
TSX | + | - |
SIPP | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-6700TE and Xeon MP 3.66 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6700TE and Xeon MP 3.66 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6700TE and Xeon MP 3.66. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 530 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6700TE and Xeon MP 3.66.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 8 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 135 Watt |
i7-6700TE has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 285.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-6700TE and Xeon MP 3.66. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i7-6700TE is a desktop processor while Xeon MP 3.66 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6700TE and Xeon MP 3.66, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.