FX-6330 vs i7-640M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-640M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.35

FX-6330 outperforms Core i7-640M by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-640M and FX-6330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22601673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency3.522.12
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date13 September 2010 (14 years ago)15 December 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-640M and FX-6330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128 KB288 KB
L2 cache512 KB6 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+114 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-640M and FX-6330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288,PGA988AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-640M and FX-6330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-640M and FX-6330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-640M and FX-6330 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-640M and FX-6330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency766 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-640M and FX-6330 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-640M and FX-6330.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-640M 1.35
FX-6330 2.90
+115%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-640M 2070
FX-6330 4433
+114%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 2.90
Recency 13 September 2010 15 December 2015
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 6
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

i7-640M has 257.1% lower power consumption.

FX-6330, on the other hand, has a 114.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The FX-6330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-640M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-640M is a notebook processor while FX-6330 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-640M and FX-6330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-640M
Core i7-640M
AMD FX-6330
FX-6330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 518 votes

Rate Core i7-640M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 39 votes

Rate FX-6330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-640M or FX-6330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.