EPYC 7713 vs i7-640M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-640M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.30
EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
52.14
+3911%

EPYC 7713 outperforms Core i7-640M by a whopping 3911% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-640M and EPYC 7713 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking226529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.87
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency3.5221.93
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date1 September 2010 (14 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$7,060

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-640M and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.68 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier2120
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size81+114 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors384 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-640M and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketBGA1288,PGA988SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-640M and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-640M and EPYC 7713 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-640M and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-640M and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency766 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-640M and EPYC 7713 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-640M and EPYC 7713.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-640M 1.30
EPYC 7713 52.14
+3911%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-640M 2070
EPYC 7713 82825
+3901%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-640M 426
EPYC 7713 1579
+271%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-640M 805
EPYC 7713 15297
+1800%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.30 52.14
Recency 1 September 2010 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

i7-640M has 542.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7713, on the other hand, has a 3910.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-640M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-640M is a notebook processor while EPYC 7713 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-640M and EPYC 7713, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-640M
Core i7-640M
AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 523 votes

Rate Core i7-640M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 115 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-640M or EPYC 7713, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.