Ultra 5 245K vs i7-640M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-640M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.30
Core Ultra 5 245K
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.50
+2015%

Core Ultra 5 245K outperforms Core i7-640M by a whopping 2015% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-640M and Core Ultra 5 245K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2265174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data73.71
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency3.5220.82
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 September 2010 (14 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-640M and Core Ultra 5 245K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads414
Base clock speed2.8 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s159 MHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size81+114 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors384 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-640M and Core Ultra 5 245K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288,PGA9881851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-640M and Core Ultra 5 245K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX-+
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-+
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-640M and Core Ultra 5 245K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-640M and Core Ultra 5 245K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-640M and Core Ultra 5 245K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency766 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-640M and Core Ultra 5 245K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-640M and Core Ultra 5 245K.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-640M 1.30
Ultra 5 245K 27.50
+2015%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-640M 2070
Ultra 5 245K 43682
+2010%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.30 27.50
Recency 1 September 2010 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 4 14
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

i7-640M has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245K, on the other hand, has a 2015.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 600% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 245K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-640M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-640M is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 245K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-640M and Core Ultra 5 245K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-640M
Core i7-640M
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 523 votes

Rate Core i7-640M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 19 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-640M or Core Ultra 5 245K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.