Atom D2700 vs i7-620UM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-620UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.69
+138%
Atom D2700
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.29

Core i7-620UM outperforms Atom D2700 by a whopping 138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-620UM and Atom D2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27153107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Atom
Power efficiency3.632.74
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)1 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$278$52

Detailed specifications

Core i7-620UM and Atom D2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.06 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz0.13 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+114 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-620UM and Atom D2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620UM and Atom D2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
AMTno data-
HD Audiono data+

Security technologies

Core i7-620UM and Atom D2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620UM and Atom D2700 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620UM and Atom D2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-620UM and Atom D2700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620UM and Atom D2700.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes164
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-620UM 0.69
+138%
Atom D2700 0.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-620UM 1091
+134%
Atom D2700 467

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 0.29
Recency 7 January 2010 1 November 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 10 Watt

i7-620UM has a 137.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom D2700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 80% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-620UM is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D2700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-620UM and Atom D2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-620UM
Core i7-620UM
Intel Atom D2700
Atom D2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 12 votes

Rate Core i7-620UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 29 votes

Rate Atom D2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-620UM or Atom D2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.