Celeron M 353 vs i7-620M

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-620M and Celeron M 353 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2313not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Celeron M
Power efficiency3.38no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$332no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-620M and Celeron M 353 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz0.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s400 MHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors384 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-620M and Celeron M 353 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketBGA1288,PGA988no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620M and Celeron M 353. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-620M and Celeron M 353 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620M and Celeron M 353 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620M and Celeron M 353. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency766 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-620M and Celeron M 353 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620M and Celeron M 353.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-620M 3473
+721%
Celeron M 353 423

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 5 Watt

i7-620M has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 353, on the other hand, has 600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-620M and Celeron M 353. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-620M and Celeron M 353, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-620M
Core i7-620M
Intel Celeron M 353
Celeron M 353

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 329 votes

Rate Core i7-620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 22 votes

Rate Celeron M 353 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-620M or Celeron M 353, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.