Celeron U3400 vs i7-620LM

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-620LM and Celeron U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2543not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Celeron
Power efficiency3.37no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$300no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-620LM and Celeron U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier158
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+144 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-620LM and Celeron U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1288BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620LM and Celeron U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i7-620LM and Celeron U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620LM and Celeron U3400 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620LM and Celeron U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR3-800
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency566 MHz500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-620LM and Celeron U3400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620LM and Celeron U3400.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-620LM 1406
+172%
Celeron U3400 516

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-620LM 406
+131%
Celeron U3400 176

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-620LM 762
+143%
Celeron U3400 313

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 24 May 2010
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 18 Watt

i7-620LM has 100% more threads.

Celeron U3400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-620LM and Celeron U3400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-620LM and Celeron U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-620LM
Core i7-620LM
Intel Celeron U3400
Celeron U3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Core i7-620LM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 30 votes

Rate Celeron U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-620LM or Celeron U3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.