Ryzen 3 1300X vs i7-5950HQ
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-5950HQ outperforms Ryzen 3 1300X by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 3 1300X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1233 | 1342 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.49 | 4.17 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core i7 | AMD Ryzen 3 |
Power efficiency | 9.89 | 6.39 |
Architecture codename | Broadwell-H (2015) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 2 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 27 July 2017 (7 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $623 | $129 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 3 1300X has 751% better value for money than i7-5950HQ.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 3 1300X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
Multiplier | 29 | 34 |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 182 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 4800 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 3 1300X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | FCBGA1364 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 3 1300X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Smart Response | + | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 3 1300X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 3 1300X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 3 1300X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | - |
Max video memory | 32 GB | - |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | - |
Clear Video HD | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | - |
InTru 3D | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 3 1300X integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | - |
eDP | + | - |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
VGA | + | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 3 1300X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | - |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 3 1300X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 11.2/12 | - |
OpenGL | 4.3 | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 3 1300X.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.91 | 4.39 |
Recency | 2 June 2015 | 27 July 2017 |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 65 Watt |
i7-5950HQ has a 11.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 38.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 1300X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.
The Core i7-5950HQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 1300X in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 3 1300X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.