i9-13900T vs i7-4860HQ

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4860HQ
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
4.00
Core i9-13900T
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 35 Watt
28.31
+608%

Core i9-13900T outperforms Core i7-4860HQ by a whopping 608% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4860HQ and Core i9-13900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1433169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data42.12
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency7.9075.13
Architecture codenameCrystalwell (2013−2014)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date19 January 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$434$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4860HQ and Core i9-13900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size264 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4860HQ and Core i9-13900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1364FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4860HQ and Core i9-13900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-4860HQ and Core i9-13900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4860HQ and Core i9-13900T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4860HQ and Core i9-13900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200Intel UHD Graphics 770
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4860HQ and Core i9-13900T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4860HQ and Core i9-13900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4860HQ and Core i9-13900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1212
OpenGL4.34.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4860HQ and Core i9-13900T.

PCIe version35.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4860HQ 4.00
i9-13900T 28.31
+608%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-4860HQ 6242
i9-13900T 44125
+607%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.00 28.31
Integrated graphics card 3.08 6.15
Recency 19 January 2014 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 35 Watt

i9-13900T has a 607.8% higher aggregate performance score, 99.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 500% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 34.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900T is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4860HQ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-4860HQ is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4860HQ and Core i9-13900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4860HQ
Core i7-4860HQ
Intel Core i9-13900T
Core i9-13900T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7 votes

Rate Core i7-4860HQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 67 votes

Rate Core i9-13900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4860HQ or Core i9-13900T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.