Phenom II X4 820 vs i7-4860EQ
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-4860EQ outperforms Phenom II X4 820 by a whopping 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-4860EQ and Phenom II X4 820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1537 | 2257 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.98 | 1.31 |
| Architecture codename | Crystalwell (2013−2014) | Deneb (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 20 February 2014 (10 years ago) | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $90 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-4860EQ and Phenom II X4 820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 264 mm2 | 258 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 758 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-4860EQ and Phenom II X4 820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1364 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4860EQ and Phenom II X4 820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-4860EQ and Phenom II X4 820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4860EQ and Phenom II X4 820 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4860EQ and Phenom II X4 820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 5200 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4860EQ and Phenom II X4 820.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.53 | 1.34 |
| Recency | 20 February 2014 | 1 September 2009 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 95 Watt |
i7-4860EQ has a 163.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 102.1% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-4860EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 820 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i7-4860EQ is a notebook processor while Phenom II X4 820 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4860EQ and Phenom II X4 820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
