EPYC 7302P vs i7-4800MQ

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4800MQ
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
3.61
EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
20.57
+470%

EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i7-4800MQ by a whopping 470% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4800MQ and EPYC 7302P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1499267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.48
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.2712.56
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4800MQ and EPYC 7302P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size177 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4800MQ and EPYC 7302P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA946TR4
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4800MQ and EPYC 7302P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FDI+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-4800MQ and EPYC 7302P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4800MQ and EPYC 7302P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4800MQ and EPYC 7302P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.763 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4600no data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4800MQ and EPYC 7302P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4800MQ and EPYC 7302P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4800MQ and EPYC 7302P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4800MQ and EPYC 7302P.

PCIe version3no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4800MQ 3.61
EPYC 7302P 20.57
+470%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-4800MQ 5736
EPYC 7302P 32669
+470%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-4800MQ 1069
EPYC 7302P 1172
+9.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-4800MQ 3203
EPYC 7302P 7873
+146%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.61 20.57
Recency 29 April 2013 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 155 Watt

i7-4800MQ has 229.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7302P, on the other hand, has a 469.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7302P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4800MQ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-4800MQ is a notebook processor while EPYC 7302P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4800MQ and EPYC 7302P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4800MQ
Core i7-4800MQ
AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 207 votes

Rate Core i7-4800MQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4800MQ or EPYC 7302P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.