Atom C3508 vs i7-4800MQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4800MQ
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
3.61
+219%
Atom C3508
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 11 Watt
1.13

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Atom C3508 by a whopping 219% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4800MQ and Atom C3508 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14992384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Atom
Power efficiency7.279.51
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4800MQ and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64K (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4800MQ and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA946FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-4800MQ and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size32 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4600no data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4800MQ and Atom C3508 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Atom C3508 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Atom C3508 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Atom C3508.

PCIe version33
PCI Express lanes168
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4800MQ 3.61
+219%
Atom C3508 1.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-4800MQ 5734
+219%
Atom C3508 1796

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.61 1.13
Recency 29 April 2013 15 August 2017
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 11 Watt

i7-4800MQ has a 219.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Atom C3508, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 327.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-4800MQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3508 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-4800MQ is a notebook processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4800MQ and Atom C3508, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4800MQ
Core i7-4800MQ
Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 206 votes

Rate Core i7-4800MQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4800MQ or Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.