Ryzen 7 5825U vs Core i7-4700MQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4700MQ
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
3.45
Ryzen 7 5825U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
11.90
+245%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms i7-4700MQ by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4700MQ and Ryzen 7 5825U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1494623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Barcelo-U (Zen 3)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$288no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4700MQ and Ryzen 7 5825U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache256 KB512 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cache6 MB16 MB
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die size177 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1400 Million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4700MQ and Ryzen 7 5825U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketrPGAFP6
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4700MQ and Ryzen 7 5825U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-4700MQ and Ryzen 7 5825U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4700MQ and Ryzen 7 5825U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4700MQ and Ryzen 7 5825U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4700MQ and Ryzen 7 5825U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4700MQ 3.45
Ryzen 7 5825U 11.90
+245%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-4700MQ 5343
Ryzen 7 5825U 18403
+244%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 244% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

i7-4700MQ 999
Ryzen 7 5825U 1668
+67%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 67% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

i7-4700MQ 3035
Ryzen 7 5825U 6276
+107%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 107% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-4700MQ 4934
Ryzen 7 5825U 6304
+27.8%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 28% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-4700MQ 19019
Ryzen 7 5825U 32641
+71.6%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 72% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-4700MQ 6872
Ryzen 7 5825U 11292
+64.3%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 64% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-4700MQ 8.37
+9.9%
Ryzen 7 5825U 9.2

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 10% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-4700MQ 7
Ryzen 7 5825U 19
+169%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 169% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-4700MQ 631
Ryzen 7 5825U 1778
+182%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 182% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-4700MQ 132
Ryzen 7 5825U 232
+75.4%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 75% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-4700MQ 1.51
Ryzen 7 5825U 2.75
+82.1%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 82% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4700MQ 3.7
Ryzen 7 5825U 8.7
+135%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 135% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i7-4700MQ 4266
Ryzen 7 5825U 5835
+36.8%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 37% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i7-4700MQ 39
Ryzen 7 5825U 100
+159%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 159% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i7-4700MQ 148
Ryzen 7 5825U 250
+68.6%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Core i7-4700MQ by 69% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.45 11.90
Integrated graphics card 1.84 9.11
Recency 1 June 2013 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 5825U has a 244.9% higher aggregate performance score, 395.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 214.3% more advanced lithography process, and 213.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 5825U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4700MQ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4700MQ and Ryzen 7 5825U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4700MQ
Core i7-4700MQ
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
Ryzen 7 5825U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 355 votes

Rate Core i7-4700MQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 639 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4700MQ or Ryzen 7 5825U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.