m5-6Y57 vs i7-4700HQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4700HQ
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
3.54
+139%
Core m5-6Y57
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.48

Core i7-4700HQ outperforms Core m5-6Y57 by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4700HQ and Core m5-6Y57 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15172156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core m5
Power efficiency7.1328.01
Architecture codenameCrystalwell (2013−2014)Skylake-Y (2015)
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$281

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4700HQ and Core m5-6Y57 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 GT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size264 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4700HQ and Core m5-6Y57 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1364FCBGA1515
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4700HQ and Core m5-6Y57. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Smart Responseno data+
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-4700HQ and Core m5-6Y57 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection+-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4700HQ and Core m5-6Y57 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4700HQ and Core m5-6Y57. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s29.861 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600Intel HD Graphics 515
Max video memory2 GB16 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz900 MHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4700HQ and Core m5-6Y57 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4700HQ and Core m5-6Y57 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160@30Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over VGA2880x1800@60HzN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4700HQ and Core m5-6Y57 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1212
OpenGL4.34.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4700HQ and Core m5-6Y57.

PCIe version33.0
PCI Express lanes1610

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4700HQ 3.54
+139%
m5-6Y57 1.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-4700HQ 5630
+140%
m5-6Y57 2345

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-4700HQ 4895
+27.2%
m5-6Y57 3849

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-4700HQ 18609
+189%
m5-6Y57 6428

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-4700HQ 6759
+160%
m5-6Y57 2596

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-4700HQ 8.09
+171%
m5-6Y57 21.9

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-4700HQ 7
+250%
m5-6Y57 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i7-4700HQ 637
+254%
m5-6Y57 180

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i7-4700HQ 132
+30.7%
m5-6Y57 101

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i7-4700HQ 1.5
+32.7%
m5-6Y57 1.13

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i7-4700HQ 3.8
+150%
m5-6Y57 1.5

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i7-4700HQ 34
+190%
m5-6Y57 12

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i7-4700HQ 141
+52.3%
m5-6Y57 93

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i7-4700HQ 4325
+91%
m5-6Y57 2264

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

i7-4700HQ 11900
+127%
m5-6Y57 5244

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

i7-4700HQ 3156
+18.1%
m5-6Y57 2672

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.54 1.48
Integrated graphics card 1.84 1.64
Recency 27 May 2013 1 September 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 4 Watt

i7-4700HQ has a 139.2% higher aggregate performance score, 12.2% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

m5-6Y57, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 1075% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-4700HQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m5-6Y57 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4700HQ and Core m5-6Y57, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4700HQ
Core i7-4700HQ
Intel Core m5-6Y57
Core m5-6Y57

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 257 votes

Rate Core i7-4700HQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 53 votes

Rate Core m5-6Y57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4700HQ or Core m5-6Y57, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.