EPYC 7371 vs i7-3970X

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3970X
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 150 Watt
5.38
EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
19.45
+262%

EPYC 7371 outperforms Core i7-3970X by a whopping 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3970X and EPYC 7371 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1164290
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.555.39
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency3.389.16
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date1 November 2012 (12 years ago)13 November 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$593$1,550

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7371 has 880% better value for money than i7-3970X.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3970X and EPYC 7371 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data31
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1.5 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache15 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2213 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 million19200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3970X and EPYC 7371 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011TR4
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3970X and EPYC 7371. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3970X and EPYC 7371 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3970X and EPYC 7371 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3970X and EPYC 7371. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64.45 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3970X and EPYC 7371.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3970X 5.38
EPYC 7371 19.45
+262%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3970X 8516
EPYC 7371 30782
+261%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.38 19.45
Recency 1 November 2012 13 November 2018
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 200 Watt

i7-3970X has 33.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7371, on the other hand, has a 261.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3970X in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-3970X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7371 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3970X and EPYC 7371, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3970X
Core i7-3970X
AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 30 votes

Rate Core i7-3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3970X or EPYC 7371, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.