Xeon E-2488 vs i7-3930K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3930K
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
5.16
Xeon E-2488
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.38
+256%

Xeon E-2488 outperforms Core i7-3930K by a whopping 256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3930K and Xeon E-2488 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1206327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.5575.32
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.7618.31
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$611$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2488 has 13595% better value for money than i7-3930K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3930K and Xeon E-2488 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s16 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size435 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3930K and Xeon E-2488 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3930K and Xeon E-2488. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-3930K and Xeon E-2488 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3930K and Xeon E-2488 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3930K and Xeon E-2488. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64.23 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3930K and Xeon E-2488.

PCIe version2.05
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3930K 5.16
Xeon E-2488 18.38
+256%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3930K 8203
Xeon E-2488 29191
+256%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.16 18.38
Recency 14 November 2011 14 December 2023
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E-2488 has a 256.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2488 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3930K in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-3930K is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2488 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3930K and Xeon E-2488, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3930K
Core i7-3930K
Intel Xeon E-2488
Xeon E-2488

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 279 votes

Rate Core i7-3930K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon E-2488 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3930K or Xeon E-2488, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.