EPYC 9275F vs i7-3820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3820 and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1490not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.32no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.64no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Turin (2024)
Release dateFebruary 2012 (12 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$400$3,439

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3820 and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size294 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors1270 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3820 and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA2011SP5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3820 and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-3820 and EPYC 9275F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3820 and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3820 and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size64.23 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3820 and EPYC 9275F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 320 Watt

i7-3820 has 146.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-3820 and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-3820 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9275F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3820 and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3820
Core i7-3820
AMD EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 326 votes

Rate Core i7-3820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9275F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3820 or EPYC 9275F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.