Opteron 6282 SE vs i7-3770K
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-3770K outperforms Opteron 6282 SE by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-3770K and Opteron 6282 SE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1397 | 1409 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.62 | 0.56 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i7 (Desktop) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.00 | 2.72 |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 29 April 2012 (12 years ago) | 14 November 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $294 | $1,090 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-3770K has 11% better value for money than Opteron 6282 SE.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-3770K and Opteron 6282 SE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI | no data |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 35 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 8 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 160 mm2 | 316 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 0 Million | 2,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-3770K and Opteron 6282 SE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 |
| Socket | FCLGA1155 | G34 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 77 Watt | 140 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770K and Opteron 6282 SE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| FDI | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-3770K and Opteron 6282 SE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770K and Opteron 6282 SE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770K and Opteron 6282 SE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3770K and Opteron 6282 SE integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770K and Opteron 6282 SE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.07 | 4.02 |
| Recency | 29 April 2012 | 14 November 2011 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 77 Watt | 140 Watt |
i7-3770K has a 1.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 81.8% lower power consumption.
Opteron 6282 SE, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-3770K and Opteron 6282 SE.
Note that Core i7-3770K is a desktop processor while Opteron 6282 SE is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770K and Opteron 6282 SE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
