Celeron J4025 vs i7-3770

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3770
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 77 Watt
4.04
+334%
Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93

Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron J4025 by a whopping 334% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3770 and Celeron J4025 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14182526
Place by popularity22not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.702.67
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.978.80
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4025 has 281% better value for money than i7-3770.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3770 and Celeron J4025 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm293 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3770 and Celeron J4025 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155Intel BGA 1090
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770 and Celeron J4025. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3770 and Celeron J4025 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770 and Celeron J4025 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770 and Celeron J4025. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3770 and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770 and Celeron J4025.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3770 4.04
+334%
Celeron J4025 0.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3770 6411
+334%
Celeron J4025 1477

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-3770 673
+105%
Celeron J4025 329

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-3770 2314
+329%
Celeron J4025 539

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.04 0.93
Integrated graphics card 1.18 0.87
Recency 29 April 2012 4 November 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 10 Watt

i7-3770 has a 334.4% higher aggregate performance score, 35.6% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron J4025, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 670% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770 and Celeron J4025, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3770
Core i7-3770
Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7351 vote

Rate Core i7-3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 129 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3770 or Celeron J4025, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.