i7-870S vs i7-3632QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3632QM
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
3.02
+70.6%
Core i7-870S
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 82 Watt
1.77

Core i7-3632QM outperforms Core i7-870S by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3632QM and Core i7-870S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16392025
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency8.012.00
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date19 October 2012 (12 years ago)19 July 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3632QM and Core i7-870S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s2.5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm2296 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,480 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3632QM and Core i7-870S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt82 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3632QM and Core i7-870S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3632QM and Core i7-870S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3632QM and Core i7-870S are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3632QM and Core i7-870S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3632QM and Core i7-870S integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3632QM and Core i7-870S.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3632QM 3.02
+70.6%
i7-870S 1.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3632QM 4707
+70.2%
i7-870S 2765

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.02 1.77
Recency 19 October 2012 19 July 2010
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 82 Watt

i7-3632QM has a 70.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 134.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3632QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-870S in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-3632QM is a notebook processor while Core i7-870S is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3632QM and Core i7-870S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3632QM
Core i7-3632QM
Intel Core i7-870S
Core i7-870S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 723 votes

Rate Core i7-3632QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Core i7-870S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3632QM or Core i7-870S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.