Celeron N5095A vs i7-3615QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3615QM
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
3.33
+26.1%
Celeron N5095A
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.64

Core i7-3615QM outperforms Celeron N5095A by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3615QM and Celeron N5095A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15841720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency6.8716.35
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)1 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3615QM and Celeron N5095A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3615QM and Celeron N5095A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1224BGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3615QM and Celeron N5095A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3615QM and Celeron N5095A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3615QM and Celeron N5095A are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3615QM and Celeron N5095A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3615QM and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-3615QM and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-3615QM and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3615QM and Celeron N5095A.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes168
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3615QM 3.33
+26.1%
Celeron N5095A 2.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3615QM 5198
+26.2%
Celeron N5095A 4118

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.33 2.64
Integrated graphics card 1.18 5.58
Recency 29 April 2012 1 July 2021
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

i7-3615QM has a 26.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron N5095A, on the other hand, has 372.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3615QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095A in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-3615QM is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095A is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3615QM and Celeron N5095A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3615QM
Core i7-3615QM
Intel Celeron N5095A
Celeron N5095A

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 47 votes

Rate Core i7-3615QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 97 votes

Rate Celeron N5095A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3615QM or Celeron N5095A, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.