Celeron E3300 vs i7-3540M

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3540M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.88
+276%
Celeron E3300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.50

Core i7-3540M outperforms Celeron E3300 by a whopping 276% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3540M and Celeron E3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19742876
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.83
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency5.080.73
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date8 January 2013 (11 years ago)30 August 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349$70

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3540M and Celeron E3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size118 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C74 °C
Number of transistorsno data228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3540M and Celeron E3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023,FCPGA988LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3540M and Celeron E3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3540M and Celeron E3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3540M and Celeron E3300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3540M and Celeron E3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3540M and Celeron E3300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3540M and Celeron E3300.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3540M 1.88
+276%
Celeron E3300 0.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3540M 2980
+275%
Celeron E3300 795

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-3540M 571
+133%
Celeron E3300 245

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-3540M 1168
+196%
Celeron E3300 395

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.88 0.50
Recency 8 January 2013 30 August 2009
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

i7-3540M has a 276% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3540M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-3540M is a notebook processor while Celeron E3300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3540M and Celeron E3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3540M
Core i7-3540M
Intel Celeron E3300
Celeron E3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 171 vote

Rate Core i7-3540M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 178 votes

Rate Celeron E3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3540M or Celeron E3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.