i3-330E vs i7-3520M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3520M
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.80
+128%
Core i3-330E
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.79

Core i7-3520M outperforms Core i3-330E by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3520M and Core i3-330E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20182625
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i3
Power efficiency4.872.14
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date3 June 2012 (12 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$177

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3520M and Core i3-330E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size118 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C for rPGA,105 °C for BGA
Number of transistorsno data382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3520M and Core i3-330E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988, FCBGA1023BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3520M and Core i3-330E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i7-3520M and Core i3-330E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3520M and Core i3-330E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3520M and Core i3-330E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory size32 GB8.79 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz667 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3520M and Core i3-330E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3520M and Core i3-330E.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3520M 1.80
+128%
i3-330E 0.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3520M 2867
+128%
i3-330E 1260

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 0.79
Integrated graphics card 1.18 0.77
Recency 3 June 2012 7 January 2010
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm

i7-3520M has a 127.8% higher aggregate performance score, 53.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-3520M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-330E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3520M and Core i3-330E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3520M
Core i7-3520M
Intel Core i3-330E
Core i3-330E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 320 votes

Rate Core i7-3520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Core i3-330E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3520M or Core i3-330E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.