Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Core i7-2920XM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2920XM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
2.70
+173%
Core 2 Quad Q9000
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.99

Core i7-2920XM outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2920XM and Core 2 Quad Q9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16992464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core 2 Quad
Power efficiency4.652.08
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,096$348

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2920XM and Core 2 Quad Q9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size216 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2920XM and Core 2 Quad Q9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCPGA988PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2920XM and Core 2 Quad Q9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-2920XM and Core 2 Quad Q9000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2920XM and Core 2 Quad Q9000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2920XM and Core 2 Quad Q9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2920XM and Core 2 Quad Q9000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2920XM and Core 2 Quad Q9000.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2920XM 2.70
+173%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 0.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2920XM 4286
+172%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 1575

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2920XM 417
+52.2%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 274

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2920XM 1395
+106%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 677

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-2920XM 4379
+82.7%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 2396

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-2920XM 17188
+115%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 8008

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-2920XM 6131
+114%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 2863

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-2920XM 8.44
+140%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 20.25

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-2920XM 6
+154%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.70 0.99
Recency 3 January 2011 1 January 2009
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 45 Watt

i7-2920XM has a 172.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Quad Q9000, on the other hand, has 22.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2920XM is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2920XM and Core 2 Quad Q9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2920XM
Core i7-2920XM
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 20 votes

Rate Core i7-2920XM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 533 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2920XM or Core 2 Quad Q9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.