Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs i7-2920XM

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2920XM and Athlon Neo X2 L325 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1697not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i72x AMD Athlon Neo
Power efficiency4.64no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Congo (2009)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,096no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2920XM and Athlon Neo X2 L325 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rateno data1600 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2920XM and Athlon Neo X2 L325 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCPGA988ASB1
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2920XM and Athlon Neo X2 L325. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXHyperTransport 3.0, MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization Technology
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2920XM and Athlon Neo X2 L325 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2920XM and Athlon Neo X2 L325 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2920XM and Athlon Neo X2 L325. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2920XM and Athlon Neo X2 L325 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2920XM and Athlon Neo X2 L325.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2920XM 4286
+671%
Athlon Neo X2 L325 556

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2011 10 September 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 18 Watt

i7-2920XM has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon Neo X2 L325, on the other hand, has 205.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-2920XM and Athlon Neo X2 L325. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2920XM and Athlon Neo X2 L325, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2920XM
Core i7-2920XM
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325
Athlon Neo X2 L325

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 20 votes

Rate Core i7-2920XM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2920XM or Athlon Neo X2 L325, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.